Stand-Up Comedy
Dec012005
Filed Under Print, Stand-Up Comedy
Larry the Cable Guy recently took on David Cross in his book “GIT-R-DONE”
for slamming him in a profile of the redneck comic from Rolling Stone. Larry said that particularly takes umbrage (’cept he doesn’t use “umbrage") to Cross “hammering his fans” and asserts that Cross takes himself too seriously, that nobody ever comes to a comedian to make foreign policy. He also details how Rolling Stone went looking for a comedian to talk shit about him (with Lewis Black declining). In that same chapter, Larry also called me an idiot (not by name, mind you) for an interview I conducted with him for this site. More on David Cross’s response and my own after the jump.
More>>
Nov272005
Filed Under Sketch Comedy, Stand-Up Comedy
According to the paper of record, Dave Chappelle is just grand, thank you. Although from the sound of things, you leave one TV show and suddenly you have a reputation for not showing up to anything ever. There’s also a suggestion that the old canard that comics are less happy the more they get laughs might apply here. Obviously I can’t examine Chappelle’s head, but I’ve never seen him anything less than joyful on stage. The man often cracks up at his own material (in a charming way, mind you).

What follows is an account of his recent show at The Comedy Festival in Las Vegas, cocluding it’s less brave than the sketch show he left. The author also seems to expect that Dave would reveal on stage exactly what went on that made him want to leave something that sounds so ideal on paper (or pixels). I really don’t think this is something you can explain to people who aren’t in the situation - the biases people have about money and fame are just too great. Some have their suspicions, I have my own, but I don’t imagine this is a personal experience that’s ripe for stand-up like Richard Pryor’s freebasing or even Margaret Cho’s struggle with her identity after her failed sitcom. It’s either too involved to be funny or too much like an instinct to be defined. As long as we got Chappelle’s stand-up, I don’t miss Chappelle’s Show.
Nov252005
Filed Under Stand-Up Comedy
Though I don’t always agree with their opinions, the members of Cringe Humor are exactly what comedy needs - fans who are actually passionate for the form in all of its dark artistry. That’s why it’s always fun to see who they love and, more fun, who they hate in their annual Cringe Humor Award Nominations. Some categories it isn’t even worth mentioning a name for - Carlos Mencia seems to be a lock for Awful Comedian of the Year. But there’s room in the rest of the categories for the forgotten to be recognized. The message board thread is open to the end of the month, so if you see something in comedy not mentioned, post your comment now. But remember, Cringe Humor forums, like the panel for their late lamented Tough Crowd, aren’t for the thin-skinned. Know your shit and be prepared to defend your choices.
Nov242005
Filed Under Stand-Up Comedy
Yesterday, I referenced the AV Club interview with Sarah Silverman. On the other side of self-examination, is the A Special Thing Interview with Patton Oswalt. It’s incredibly dense discussion of how an incredible comedian has learned and evolved. The conversation delves deeper into a concept Patton’s only been able to touch on quickly in his show Comedians of Comedy… needy comedy. Simply, being funny and needing laughs don’t mix, if you want to come along with what I find funny that’s great. Being happy with yourself on stage and not worrying about what would make you popular with audiences. It’s a great lesson in how presentation is everything in comedy. Well worth the long read it’s becoming. Part one and part two are up now, with more to come. Read the AST Interview with Patton Oswalt. It’s a must for all fans of the form.
Nov232005
Filed Under Stand-Up Comedy
This A.V. Club interview with Sarah Silverman while not as good as others they’ve conducted, is still interesting simply for how little is revealed. A New Yorker story mentioned that “Because Silverman is a comedian, she doesn’t like to dissect what she does.” I disagree with this premise generally, because in order to get anywhere in comedy, you have to examine your work simply to figure out what works for you, for an audience. It might be more inexplicable that a Zen Koan, but there has to be a critical eye.
That said, this is a great example of a comic avoiding dissection, although I’m not really sure how you would answer questions like, “What was it like to be fired from [SNL]?” The most interesting part is her description of how Chris Rock would get an audience to listen to him - he’d simply start his act and let them catch up. There’s a little else there, but it’s kind of fun to see how rude-funny someone can be in print. Read the full interview here.
Nov172005
Filed Under Movies, Stand-Up Comedy
In the wake of Jesus is Magic, comaprisons of Sarah Silverman to Lenny Bruce are almost as cliche as hipster reporters salivating over her, contemplating just what does it means to be so funny and so fuckable (more on that at the end). It’s a parallel that she’s appropriately humble about. But what makes someone the next Lenny Bruce? What’s the ruler here? Here’s some answers from other sites as to if Sarah = Lenny and whether I find the comparison fair.
Onion A.V. Club Blog:
Yes. And No. Why? She’s walking a well-worn path of taboo breakers, but she walks it incredibly well. But her work isn’t attempting to make an impact in society, ultimately being about itself rather than meaningful.
Fair or Unfair Fair. Hysterically funny stuff doesn’t have to have a goal, but I think any comparisons to Lenny Bruce would require the comics to be attempting some sort of change. David Cross is far closer to Lenny Bruce in this regard. Sarah’s material lives in its own world, you live and laugh, laugh very hard, in it for the hour and you’re done.
Entertainment Weekly: No. Why not? Though “blasphemous-and-proud-of-it”, she lacks a connection with her own material in a way. We simply rehear stereotypes. Fair or Unfair? Fair, although she is found wanting in this category in opposition to Margaret Cho, whose material, while sharp, doesn’t seem as twisted. I don’t think this is necessarily a flaw, but some comics find they enjoy talking about themselves, some do not. The Sarah Silverman on stage is a character and I think it might be a function of her sex. Female comics who talk about themselves on stage are considered confessional whereas a guy who does the same is simply talking about something that happened to them. It’s an annoying categorization that people place on comediennes. I think it’s one reason why Sarah is so popular in a frustratingly masculine art, she avoids that limiting box by not putting her real self in her act. I ‘m not sure we’ll get a feminine Lenny Bruce until a comic defies that box entirely.
Cinematical: Somewhat. Why Not? Sarah will never get arrested for her material. Her struggles are against political correctness rather than establishment. Fair or Unfair? Unfair, considering times are different. Would Sarah have gotten arrested then for doing the material she performs now? Almost certainly. Even today, she still has trouble with some audiences who are not ready to hear her play on racial sterotypes (the infamous Chink statement and getting booed off stage by a largely African American audience for a Martin Luther King Joke.) A lack of spontaneity is a bit more daming, because she is very rehearsed and calculated. But she is capable of incredible improvisation, see her joke from the Aristocrats. She’s professional, not stiff.
Now, as to Sarah “coltish looks” and “porcelin skin.” I don’t think Sarah’s looks matter one bit to her comedy. You could easily issue “Jesus is Magic” on CD, with equal effect. (In fact, I hope they do). Her material is strong, although arguably the expressions on her face help sell some of them. Gushing over her looks is just another sign that so many comics and fans of comedy have never really exited puberty. Grow the fuck up, already.
Oct242005
Filed Under Stand-Up Comedy
This past Friday, stand-up Christian Finnegan nearly got beaten up by a drunk marine during his show at the Stardome theater in Birmingham, Alabama. He recaps all the details in his blog posting about the incident. The staff, including the eight it took to drag the guy outside, were great according to Christian’s account, having already cut the guy off from any alcohol prior to the incident and swooping in very quickly when he did make a move to the stage.

Despite the two empty bottles of vodka on the floor of the drunk’s car, Christian takes the ass-kicking attempt a little bit to heart, talking about how he’s been modulating material for other areas of the country to establish himself as a headliner. He states that he had already “de-balled” his set prior to the show, although he did do a bit about America being a bully. Christian concludes that wasn’t what set the guy off, but rather that he just screams “Yankee Faggot.” Comics… always focusing on the one person not laughing. Or the one trying to punch them in the face.
Christian has one great point: that avoiding beatings from the inebriated few and proud isn’t a mark of indie cred. He’s actively trying to entertain the rest of the country that isn’t below 14th St. in Manhattan. All self-deprecating references to becoming a hack aside, I think what Christian’s working on is exactly what makes a great comic… finding the common points in any audience that can bring them into your own voice. I hope he won’t think of himself as politically or culturally neutered for long.
In the meantime, if you’re a member of the armed services, here’s a schedule of Christian Finnegan’s next performances.